Metasurface optic for Gaussian beams accepts a nonplanar input beam

Aug. 1, 2019
Most metasurface optics only accept plane-wave beams; a new hybrid metal-dielectric metastructure focuses a diverging Gaussian beam back on itself.

With their potential ability to replace bulk-glass optical components, and even entire optical systems, metasurface optics have come a long way in their capabilities, including high-numerical-aperture (NA) operation and multispectral or broadband operation. But most metasurface optics today are designed to accept and modify plane waves, eliminating the possibility of finite-conjugate metasurface optics. Researchers at the Chalmers University of Technology (Göteborg, Sweden) and Politecnico di Torino (Turin, Italy) have now theoretically developed a metasurface, designed for use with monochromatic Gaussian beams, that reflects a diverging beam and forms a converging beam in the process (in other words, it’s the metasurface analogue of a concave spherical mirror)—the process has an efficiency of higher than 90%.

In the model, the subwavelength metasurface elements (meta-atoms) are fins of titanium dioxide (TiO2) with varying orientations (producing differing phases) in almost-periodic arrays. Both all-dielectric and hybrid metal-dielectric structures were modeled for wavelengths in the near-infrared, with most of the modeling done on the hybrid metal-dielectric version. The array period was 380 nm—the difference in phase between consecutive elements grew quadratically with the distance from the optical axis. The whole reflective metasurface had a radius of 12.57 µm and a focal length of 50 λ. The beam waist was 3.21 µm for both the incoming and reflected beams, with a close-to-ideal beam profile. An example phase profile for the ideal Gaussian field (blue line in figure) and cross-polarized reflected field (red dotted line) at a distance of 1350 nm from the surface matched well for the hybrid metal-dielectric structure. Reference: J. Martínez-Llinàs et al., Opt. Express, 27, 15 (Jul. 22, 2019); https://doi.org/10.1364/oe.27.021069.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Achieving Ultralow-Loss Photonics Array Alignment

Feb. 23, 2024
Two- and three-dimensional photonics arrays are commonly used for coupling light in photonic integrated circuits. With the increasing demand for ultralow-loss transmission in ...

Control Techniques in Laser Processing

Feb. 23, 2024
A laser processing tool is only as good as the motion equipment underneath it. One must first consider design characteristics of a motion platform, and second, advanced control...

High-Precision Laser Processing for Medical Device Manufacturing

Feb. 23, 2024
Laser processing has been used for decades to manufacture tubular medical devices, such as stents, valves, and vascular grafts. However, achieving the precision that is necessary...

Selecting Optimal Positioning Equipment for Laser Direct-Write Processes

Feb. 23, 2024
Choosing the optimal automation equipment for a given process requires a thorough understanding of the process parameters and the effects of positioning errors on the results....

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!