MOTION CONTROL: Tiny common-path interferometer relies on photonic crystals

July 1, 2009
Because its probe and reference beams follow the same path, a common-path interferometer can measure changes in optical phase while being mostly unaffected by ambient variations such as air turbulence.
(Courtesy of Hitachi)
A common-path phase-shifting interferometer (top) is based on PCPs, which result in a compact, rigid, and stable instrument (bottom).
A common-path phase-shifting interferometer (top) is based on PCPs, which result in a compact, rigid, and stable instrument (bottom).

Because its probe and reference beams follow the same path, a common-path interferometer can measure changes in optical phase while being mostly unaffected by ambient variations such as air turbulence. This sort of instrument is useful for precision motion control, as well as for measuring vibrations, surface profiles, variations in refractive index, and other attributes. Phase-shifting versions of common-path interferometers, either temporal (sequential phase steps) or spatial (three or four simultaneous side-by-side beams, each one phase-shifted by a different amount) provide a particularly good signal.

Two researchers at Hitachi (Yokohama, Japan), Toshihiko Nakata and Masahiro Watanabe, have developed a spatial phase-shifting common-path interferometer that is built around photonic-crystal polarizers (PCPs), making the design compact and simple, and many of its components monolithic.1 The instrument, which is about the size of a man’s thumb, has another advantage: the probe beam makes two round-trips between the reference mirror and the sample instead of the usual single round-trip, doubling the phase change and thus the sensitivity.

PCP mirror and phase-shifter

In the interferometer, a source beam with a 45° polarization is directed off a beamsplitter to a PCP reference mirror, which splits the beam into orthogonally polarized reference and probe beams and reflects the reference beam back toward the phase-shifter and detectors (see figure). The probe beam goes through a quarter-wave plate (QWP), bounces off the sample twice and the PCP once, and is then transmitted back through the PCP to the phase-shifter, recombining with the reference beam.

Two prisms split the beam into four channels, which pass through the phase-shifter. The phase-shifter itself consists of one QWP oriented at 0° and 90°, and four PCPs (one for each channel) oriented at ±45° to the polarizations of the probe and reference beams. The result is that the two beams in each of the four channels interfere with additional phase shifts of 0, π/2, π, and 3π/2, respectively. The light from the channels is monitored by four photodiodes (PDs).

The PCPs consist of 2-D subwavelength structures that are made by depositing two different kinds of dielectric films in alternating layers over a subwavelength grating, which gives the dielectric stack a triangular corrugation. The PCP variables, which can be tailored to suit different wavelengths, are the grating pitch, the stacking period, and the number of layers.

Low noise

The researchers built a prototype interferometer module measuring only 20 × 50 × 14 mm in size, with light supplied via single-mode polarization-maintaining fiber from a He-Ne laser. Its phase-shifter contains four PCPs, each 2 × 2 mm, all monolithically integrated on a silica substrate, according to Nakata.

When tested with a stage scanned linearly over a 200 nm range, the device produced four signals mutually shifted by π/2 and varying with a 158.2 nm period, confirming the device’s doubled phase change when compared to conventional interferometers. A 1 nm scan produced displacement data showing that the displacement noise level of the interferometer was less than 40 pm.

The researchers believe the instrument is well suited for position and displacement measurements on the millimeter scale, such as those for microelectromechanical systems and scanning-probe microscopes, and note that it could also be used in techniques that measure two-dimensional sample profiles, such as a pixelated phase-mask scheme.


REFERENCE

  1. T. Nakata and M. Watanabe, Applied Optics 48(7) (March 1, 2009).

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Brain Computer Interface (BCI) electrode manufacturing

Jan. 31, 2025
Learn how an industry-leading Brain Computer Interface Electrode (BCI) manufacturer used precision laser micromachining to produce high-density neural microelectrode arrays.

Electro-Optic Sensor and System Performance Verification with Motion Systems

Jan. 31, 2025
To learn how to use motion control equipment for electro-optic sensor testing, click here to read our whitepaper!

How nanopositioning helped achieve fusion ignition

Jan. 31, 2025
In December 2022, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's National Ignition Facility (NIF) achieved fusion ignition. Learn how Aerotech nanopositioning contributed to this...

Nanometer Scale Industrial Automation for Optical Device Manufacturing

Jan. 31, 2025
In optical device manufacturing, choosing automation technologies at the R&D level that are also suitable for production environments is critical to bringing new devices to market...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!