Simple modification to ToF lidar data acquisition cancels harmonic error

Dec. 11, 2015
Homodyne amplitude modulated continuous wave (AMCW) lidar is a camera-based time-of-flight (ToF) distance-measurement technique that captures data at every pixel in a scene.
Content Dam Lfw Print Articles 2015 12 1512lfw Nb 4

Homodyne amplitude modulated continuous wave (AMCW) lidar is a camera-based time-of-flight (ToF) distance-measurement technique that captures data at every pixel in a scene. However, systemic errors can be introduced in AMCW ToF by the digital hardware that is involved in acquiring the data. It turns out that the hardware modulating the light source and the sensor can introduce unwanted harmonic content into the signal, distorting it. While various approaches have been devised to combat this problem, they all have their own disadvantages, such as induced random noise or greater complexity. Now, Lee Streeter and Adrian Dorrington of the University of Waikato (Hamilton, New Zealand) have come up with a simple technique to cancel the harmonic error by modifying the data-acquisition procedure. The technique renders the data acquisition invariant to at least one harmonic (with the third harmonic being chosen, as it is the main source of error).

The light source and sensor are modulated at the same rate and with a programmable offset that is changed to measure different distances. Modulating by turning the source and sensor on and off produces square-wave modulation; the frequency content of square-wave modulation consists of the fundamental plus odd-order harmonics, with the third order greatest in amplitude. The change in the four-phase step measurement is based on relaxing the constraint that the phase steps are evenly spaced. The researchers tested their approach via simulation, comparing it to the traditional four-even-phase step AMCW range measurement, and found that it did indeed reject the third harmonic (STD = standard deviation; angles in radians). They note that, with further measurements, higher-order harmonics can also be rejected. Reference: L. Streeter and A. A. Dorrington, Opt. Lett. (2015); http://dx.doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.005391.

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Precision Motion Control for Photonics: 5 Keys to Success

Aug. 30, 2024
Precision motion control is a key element in the development and production of silicon-photonic devices. Yet, when nanometers matter, it can be challenging to evaluate and implement...

Precision Motion Control for Sample Manipulation in Ultra-High Resolution Tomography

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn the critical items that designers and engineers must consider when attempting to achieve reliable ultra-high resolution tomography results here!

Motion Control Technologies for Medical Device Joining Applications

Aug. 30, 2024
Automated laser welding is beneficial in medical device manufacturing due to its precision, cleanliness, and efficiency. When properly optimized, it allows OEMs to achieve extremely...

How to Maximize Machine Building Performance with High-Performance Laser Processing

Aug. 30, 2024
Learn how an automotive high-speed laser blanking machine manufacturer builds machines that maximize throughput for faster processing speeds and improved productivity.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!