Heated prisms deflect beam with no moving parts

May 21, 2001
Useful for optical switching and other applications, beam deflectors of nonmechanical design can be simpler and more reliable than their counterparts that rely on mechanical motions. Researchers at Radiant Research Inc. and The University of Texas at Austin (both in Austin, Texas) have developed an alternative that relies on the thermo-optic effect, in which a temperature change alters the refractive index.

Useful for optical switching and other applications, beam deflectors of nonmechanical design can be simpler and more reliable than their counterparts that rely on mechanical motions. For example, electro-optic deflectors operate with no moving parts; however, they must be driven at voltages of at least 1000 V. Researchers at Radiant Research Inc. and The University of Texas at Austin (both in Austin, Texas) have developed an alternative that relies on the thermo-optic effect, in which a temperature change alters the refractive index.

The switching structure is fabricated on silicon and consists of alternating thin-film microprisms of silica and polymer clad with silica underneath and polymer on top. The prisms are 600-µm equilateral triangles with a thickness of 5 µm. The whole is temperature-controlled by a heating electrode. The silica is doped to have the same refractive index as the polymer at 20°C. The silica has a thermo-optic coefficient of +1 × 10-5/°C, while the corresponding figure for the polymer is -1.4 × 10-4/°C; the resulting effect for the design geometry is a temperature-dependent beam deflection of 0.06°/°C. Stable to 250°C, the polymer has an optical loss of 0.2 dB/cm at 633 nm and 0.3 dB/cm at 1550 nm (silica has virtually zero loss at these scales).

Tested using 633-nm light launched into the waveguide by a spherical and a cylindrical lens, the device achieved a maximum beam deflection of 3.7° when subjected to a temperature change of 60°C. Theory predicts six resolvable spots for such a device; the actual three resolvable spots were likely due to a Gaussian beam waist too small by a factor of two. Predicted power consumption of the heating element is 10 mW. For more information, contact Suning Tang at [email protected].

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Brain Computer Interface (BCI) electrode manufacturing

Jan. 31, 2025
Learn how an industry-leading Brain Computer Interface Electrode (BCI) manufacturer used precision laser micromachining to produce high-density neural microelectrode arrays.

Electro-Optic Sensor and System Performance Verification with Motion Systems

Jan. 31, 2025
To learn how to use motion control equipment for electro-optic sensor testing, click here to read our whitepaper!

How nanopositioning helped achieve fusion ignition

Jan. 31, 2025
In December 2022, the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's National Ignition Facility (NIF) achieved fusion ignition. Learn how Aerotech nanopositioning contributed to this...

Nanometer Scale Industrial Automation for Optical Device Manufacturing

Jan. 31, 2025
In optical device manufacturing, choosing automation technologies at the R&D level that are also suitable for production environments is critical to bringing new devices to market...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!