World's best seeing site discovered

With funding for the Hubble telescope uncertain beyond 2007, the possibility of finding lower-cost Earth-based telescope alternatives is exciting to the astronomical community.

Nov 1st, 2004
Th 162920

With funding for the Hubble telescope uncertain beyond 2007, the possibility of finding lower-cost Earth-based telescope alternatives is exciting to the astronomical community. Recent observations of ­winter-time seeing from Dome C, a high point on the Antarctic plateau, suggest remarkable clarity that would allow construction of an Earth-based telescope that could easily compete with telescopes in space.1

The primary criterion for selecting a ground-based telescope site is that celestial observations exhibit extremely low “jitter”-the wobble in the apparent position of a star caused by light bending as it passes through regions of different refractive index in the Earth’s atmosphere. The best midlatitude sites have a median jitter range of 0.5 to 1.0‑arcsec; incredibly, median seeing at Dome C is 0.27 arcsec, and below 0.15‑arcsec 25% of the time. A telescope at Dome C could compete with a telescope two or three times larger at the best midlatitude observatories, and could even compete with a space-based telescope like Hubble.

Will Saunders and Andrew McGrath of the Anglo-Australian Observatory (Epping, Australia) have designed a ­telescope that capitalizes on the unique Antarctic environment of Dome C: a 16-m, wide-field, fixed-axis, all-reflective, segmented f/4 Schmidt telescope (see figure).2 A 10- to 30-m-high rampart base would be needed for the corrector and the primary mirror of the telescope to avoid ground-level turbulence. The 16-m corrector mirror would consist of segmented plates, deformable at the ±100 µm level, with deformations being produced by 500 to 2000 piezoelectric actuators.


The frozen Antarctic environment with its exceptional atmospheric clarity creates an unusual opportunity to build an Earth-based telescope that could rival larger telescopes in midlatitude locations. One concept for such a telescope is a Schmidt-Cassegrain design. A 16-m segmented steerable corrector mirror (right) reflects light from the sky to a 16-m primary mirror (left). The secondary lies halfway between the two larger mirrors.
Click here to enlarge image

Also 16 m in diameter, the primary mirror would consist of 1- to 2-m fixed glass plates or segments and would produce 0.05-arcsec pixels at prime focus to match the best 0.1-arcsec viewing conditions at Dome C. An f/4 prime focus and f/13 or f/40 Cassegrain focus would produce a large field of view and easily allow natural guide-star adaptive-optics (AO) correction for widefield optical and near-IR spectroscopy over 3° fields with 0.25-arcsec resolution. In addition, the diffraction-limited optical imaging over arc-minute fields would yield six times better resolution than the Hubble space telescope, all at a maximum cost of U.S. $200 million dollars, compared with $500 million for a 30-m-class extremely large telescope and $2.2 billion for the Hubble.

Better than the South Pole

Scientists at the University of New South Wales (New South Wales, Australia) and at the Cerro-Tololo Inter American Observatory (La Serena, Chile) have long considered the Antarctic plateau for a major observatory. Fortunately, the poor seeing conditions found at the South Pole (caused by a turbulent air layer 200 to 300‑m from the ground) are absent at Dome C because of its higher elevation (3250 m) and lower wind speeds-although the best periods of superb seeing below 0.2 arcsec are during winter after sunset.

In January 2004, the scientists installed a multi-aperture scintillation sensor (MASS) to measure wintertime seeing. The MASS uses the spatial and temporal structure of single-star scintillation (intensity fluctuations) to evaluate vertical refractive-index fluctuation ­profiles from six layers within the atmosphere, at 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0, 8.0, and 16.0‑km. Simultaneously, a sonic detection-and-ranging (SODAR) instrument determined the contribution from the layer between 30 and 500 m. The mean Dome C seeing of 0.27 arcsec is observed at midlatitude sites such as Cerro Paranal and Mauna Kea much less than 1% of the time, and the best seeing of 0.07 arcsec at Dome C is the lowest value reported anywhere. Fewer actuators, by a factor of four to ten, would be required on a Dome C AO correction system to achieve the same residual wavefront error as a ­ midlatitude system.

While approval to actually build a 16-m-diameter telescope may be years into the future, avenues of funding are currently being sought for development of a 2-m-diameter PILOT (Pathfinder for an International Large Optical Telescope). The PILOT would allow development of the technologies and techniques required to successfully exploit the full potential of the Dome C site. In fact, even a 2-m-diameter telescope at Dome C would be competitive in the IR with an 8-m-diameter telescope at a midlatitude site.

REFERENCES

1. J. S. Lawrence et al., Nature 431, 278 (Sept. 16, 2004).

2. W. Saunders and A. McGrath, SPIE conference, Glasgow, Scotland (June 2004).

More in Optics
Lasers & Sources
LASER World of PHOTONICS 2019: Inspiring