Study of optically clear epoxies under ionizing radiation results in one best choice

Aug. 11, 2020
Scientists at Fermilab studied optically clear cements for use in scintillator optics; tests under ionizing radiation from their accelerator produced a clear winner.

One of the more underrepresented materials in discussions of optics is optical cementperhaps because it’s just been doing its job for decades. But it is an optical material in the light path that can have its own effects. In one special case of this, researchers from Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Batavia, IL) have done a study on the effect of ionizing radiation on some commercially available optically clear epoxies. It should be noted that the Fermi scientists’ interests in optics relate to plastic scintillation detectors, and thus the “optically clear” cements they chose for their study are somewhat different from those usually used for precision optics. They chose plastic-scintillator cements made by Saint-Gobain (Courbevoie, France) and Eljen Technologies (Sweetwater, TX) along with some more general-purpose clear epoxies from System Three (Lacey, WA) and other epoxy manufacturers.

The epoxies were all tested for compatibility with a standard poly(vinyltoluene) scintillator, assembling the scintillators, waiting a year, and then seeing if there were any changes to the scintillator at the epoxy interface: all epoxies passed this test easily. Next, epoxy samples were prepared in two batches separated by one year, with the samples run in a centrifuge before they cured to remove bubbles (samples were 7 mm thick, which is much thicker than the typical 0.1 mm joint thickness). Transmittance over the 1901100 nm wavelength range was measured before and after exposure to a mixed radiation field at Fermilab’s accelerator. Extrapolating from the 7 mm thickness, measurements showed at least a 5% loss for a 0.1 mm thickness, although two cements did quite a bit better, especially at 400 nm, than the rest. One was difficult to work with, as its silicone-like rubberiness prevented polishing, but the other, made by System Three, was pronounced a good potential candidate for bonding scintillators to light guides or photosensors. Reference: R. J. Tesarek et al., arXiv:2007.02996v1 (July 6, 2020).

About the Author

John Wallace | Senior Technical Editor (1998-2022)

John Wallace was with Laser Focus World for nearly 25 years, retiring in late June 2022. He obtained a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering and physics at Rutgers University and a master's in optical engineering at the University of Rochester. Before becoming an editor, John worked as an engineer at RCA, Exxon, Eastman Kodak, and GCA Corporation.

Sponsored Recommendations

Demonstrating Flexible, Powerful 5-axis Laser Micromachining

Sept. 18, 2024
Five-axis scan heads offer fast and flexible solutions for generating precise holes, contoured slots and other geometries with fully defined cross sections. With a suitable system...

Enhance Your Experiments with Chroma's Spectra Viewer

Sept. 5, 2024
Visualize and compare fluorescence spectra with our interactive Spectra Viewer tool. Easily compare and optimize filters and fluorochromes for your experiments with this intuitive...

Optical Filter Orientation Guide

Sept. 5, 2024
Ensure optimal performance of your optical filters with our Orientation Guide. Learn the correct placement and handling techniques to maximize light transmission and filter efficiency...

Ensure Optimal Performance with Shortpass Filters

Sept. 5, 2024
Achieve precise wavelength blocking with our Shortpass Filters. Ideal for applications requiring effective light transmission and cutoff, these filters ensure optimal performance...

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!