Optimizing solid-state illumination, from source to sample plane

Dec. 10, 2020
When photons from a light engine are getting lost on their way to the microscope’s sample plane, follow this path to find the failure point(s).

Increasingly, sophisticated light engines with an array of solid-state technologies are being used in fluorescence microscopy. The design of these light sources overcomes significant limitations of mercury and metal halide arc lamps, enabling impressive performance far surpassing that of those earlier illumination options. Solid-state light engines provide high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and resolution, low detection limits, and enhanced sensitivity and stability for fluorescence microscopy applications—as well as high-quality data, longevity, and cost savings.

However, for the value of that performance to be realized, the output of the illuminator must be propagated to the sample plane of the microscope.1,2 An analysis of the light path connecting the light engine to the microscope sample plane provides a framework not only for optimizing instrument performance, but also for troubleshooting illumination problems. 

The path to truth

When deficiency in fluorescence excitation at the sample plane is discovered, it seems appropriate (and it is common) to attribute the problem to the light source. But such attribution is commonly inappropriate because, in fact, all of the intervening components along the path are potentially implicated. Actually solving the issue requires a thoughtful review of contributions made by all the optical components that transfer illuminator output to the microscope (see figure), and thus affect overall system throughput.

The table presents a stepwise analysis of light throughput from a solid-state light engine to the sample plane of a microscope. The measured fluxes at the sample plane using the 10X objective (Location 5A) correspond to irradiance levels of 15–50 mW/mm2, well within the required range for widefield fluorescence microscopy (1–100 mW/mm2).

For fluorescence microscopy applications, the irradiance required to generate a certain amount of fluorescence emission is not the same at all wavelengths. This is because fluorescence emission intensity depends on the number of photons available for absorption by the fluorophore, which increases with wavelength for a constant level of irradiance. The irradiance required to generate a certain fluorescence intensity level with 375 nm excitation light is therefore double that required at 750 nm (2 × 375 nm), to the extent that other factors remain constant. Consequently, the lower radiant flux levels in the red spectral region (635/22 nm; see far right column in the table) are less detrimental than they might seem in the context of fluorescence microscopy.

Although the radiant flux levels shown in the table are more than sufficient for conventional widefield fluorescence microscopy, opportunities for improvement do exist. Such improvements are directed towards two main application requirements. First, to acquire more images in a shorter space of time without compromising SNR characteristics requires higher radiant flux from the light source coupled to shorter camera exposure times. Second, many techniques for increasing the spatial resolution of widefield fluorescence microscopy involve spatially filtering the illumination. The loss incurred by spatial filtering must be compensated by increasing the output of the light source or improving its coupling to the microscope, or both. 

Getting to better

As an illustrative exercise, let’s briefly examine some ways in which these improvements can be achieved, referring to the light path stages identified in the table.

Light engine. Improvements in output power (particularly in terms of irradiance) can be achieved by using solid-state diode laser light sources, as opposed to the non-coherent sources incorporated in the SPECTRA X light engine used in this example.

Liquid light guide. A liquid light guide provides benefits in terms of vibrational isolation of the light engine from the microscope. It can also allow the light source to be situated remotely, away from the often-congested space adjacent to the microscope. However, these benefits can come at the cost of 35–50% of the light engine output—though with a sufficiently powerful light engine, the significance of these losses may be ameliorated. And although a liquid light guide with a larger diameter (e.g., 5 mm instead of 3 mm) delivers a substantial increase in radiant flux, this generally requires re-engineering of the microscope light path to propagate the increase to the sample plane.

Collimating adapter. Collimators incorporating fly-eye lenses3 provide superior light throughput and spatial uniformity compared to conventional designs based on an achromatic lens.

Objective. In epifluorescence microscopy, the detected fluorescence intensity scales with the fourth power of the numerical aperture (NA) of the objective lens. Therefore, the preferred objective is one with the highest numerical aperture that provides adequate working distance.

Illumination for fluorescence microscopy has undergone a paradigm shift. Traditional arc lamps have many limitations, including the fact that they contain toxic mercury vapor. Traditional LEDs, on the other hand, underserve optical power requirements. Solid-state light engines solve for these problems and can be seen as a likely candidate when insufficient light is discovered as an additional problem. But following the steps of the analysis presented above will help microscopists understand the details of illuminator-to-microscope coupling, and gain confidence in finding the true source of such issues. The hope is that it will also assist researchers in taking maximum advantage of the performance offered by modern solid-state light engines.


1. D. Grünwald, S. M. Shenoy, S. Burke, and R. H. Singer, Nat. Protoc., 3, 1809–1814 (2008).

2. D. Dormann, PLoS One, 14, e0214659 (2019).

3. B. Van Giel, Y. Meuret, and H. Thienpont, Opt. Eng., 46, 043001 (2007).

About the Author

Jasmin Schaefer | Technical Support Specialist, Lumencor

Jasmin Schaefer is Technical Support Specialist at Lumencor (Beaverton, OR).

About the Author

Iain Johnson | Director of Technical Support, Lumencor

Iain Johnson is Director of Technical Support at Lumencor (Beaverton, OR).

About the Author

Claudia Jaffe | Co-Founder & Executive Vice President of Business Development, Lumencor

Claudia Jaffe, Ph.D., is Co-Founder & Executive Vice President of Business Development at Lumencor (Beaverton, OR).

Sponsored Recommendations

Request a free Micro 3D Printed sample part

April 11, 2024
The best way to understand the part quality we can achieve is by seeing it first-hand. Request a free 3D printed high-precision sample part.

How to Tune Servo Systems: The Basics

April 10, 2024
Learn how to tune a servo system using frequency-based tools to meet system specifications by watching our webinar!

Motion Scan and Data Collection Methods for Electro-Optic System Testing

April 10, 2024
Learn how different scanning patterns and approaches can be used in measuring an electro-optic sensor performance, by reading our whitepaper here!

How Precision Motion Systems are Shaping the Future of Semiconductor Manufacturing

March 28, 2024
This article highlights the pivotal role precision motion systems play in supporting the latest semiconductor manufacturing trends.

Voice your opinion!

To join the conversation, and become an exclusive member of Laser Focus World, create an account today!